Learning zone
Dilemmas
This month's dilemma: Cameron gets on well with his therapist. They have developed a quasi-supervisory relationship during his counselling training and now he thinks she might be an ideal supervisor
Read moreStudent column
We’ve always been told throughout the counselling course that the journey each of us will follow during training will change us
Read moreHindsights
Why I became a counsellor
What makes a good therapist? What values do you hold dear? Former nurse Els van Ooijen wanted to be able to help her patients emotionally, but also to understand and heal herself
Read moreFeedback
We value your feedback. Like most websites, Therapy Today.net is in ongoing development. If we can make the site more user-friendly or relevant to you, please let us know Leave feedback
Last month’s BACP annual conference was a good event with excellent speakers and much important debate about the crucial issues of the day. During the awards ceremony – which gets more like the Oscars every year – speaker after speaker movingly described innovative work being done by dedicated practitioners across a wide range of community settings
Editorial
Last month’s BACP annual conference was a good event with excellent speakers and much important debate about the crucial issues of the day. During the awards ceremony – which gets more like the Oscars every year – speaker after speaker movingly described innovative work being done by dedicated practitioners across a wide range of community settings. Relate received an award for Innovation in Counselling and Psychotherapy for their Responsive Model which you can read about on page 10. This impressive and valuable work involves training all staff and counsellors in how to respond, as opposed to react, to each partner in a situation where domestic violence and abuse are disclosed. I was particularly struck by the language the model uses, abandoning the concepts of victim/perpetrator, and replacing this with a neutral language that focuses on behaviour and safety.
At the conference panel debate (see page 14), speakers were asked to comment on the future of the profession and a debate ensued around therapists’ reluctance to manage upwards and engage with the powers that be where policy is decided and funding allocated. Given that IAPT has ‘transformed what we do from a cottage industry into an industrialisation process’, we have no choice, argued Jeremy Clarke, but to get to grips with delivering our therapies on a far bigger scale than we have ever imagined possible. In order to do this, he suggested, we must get over our tendency to not engage with what we are not comfortable with. The crux of the issue, Nicola Barden suggested rather poignantly, is ‘Do we want to get ahead in this world or not?’
In response to a question about the availability of paid work, John McLeod said that compared to those working in the NHS where long waiting lists are the norm, counsellors and psychotherapists in private practice were often underemployed, largely he thought because of their failure to effectively communicate to the public what they are selling. Are there missed opportunities, he wondered, if people are prepared to pay £1,000 a year to join a fitness club; if people had a better understanding of what therapists could do for their emotional wellbeing, might some of their money be better spent on therapy? Clearly we all need to learn to love marketing!







