Related articles
A response to ‘To resist is to exist’ by Martin Kemp and Eliana Pinto |
| "The recent spate of correspondence over the publication in Therapy Today of ‘To resist is to exist’ by Martin Kemp and Eliana Pinto (March 2009) has raised the ire of many readers, despite the BACP statement that BACP ‘has no position or policy with regard to Middle East politics’" |
Trauma: the unreported casualty of war |
| "In the March issue of this journal, two psychotherapists wrote about the psychological impact of military occupation on the Palestinian people. In response, David Bedein reports from Sderot on the effects of Palestinian rocket fire on the city's residents" |
Palestine: to resist is to exist |
| "We have received an unprecedented amount of correspondence, both negative and positive, in reponse to last month's article 'To resist is to exist'. More of this can be read here (see 'related articles, right)" |
To resist is to exist |
| "Notes on the psychological impact of military occupation in Palestine" |
Learning zone
Dilemmas
This month's dilemma: Would you break confidentiality if a reluctant client fails to attend, or respond to letters while owing money?
Read moreCounselling and Psychotherapy Research (CPR)
is a peer reviewed, quarterly international journal. Visit http://www.cprjournal.com/ to read abstracts, receive regular e-bulletins and access the research glossaryHindsights
Why I became a counsellor
What makes a good therapist? What values do you hold dear? Heather Dale responds to our questions
Read moreFeedback
We value your feedback. Like most websites, Therapy Today.net is in ongoing development. If we can make the site more user-friendly or relevant to you, please let us know Leave feedback
We were very disappointed to read your article ‘To Resist is to Exist’. The article contained several factual errors and omissions which led to conclusions that we dispute.
Misleading without another viewpoint
We were very disappointed to read your article ‘To Resist is to Exist’. The article contained several factual errors and omissions which led to conclusions that we dispute. For example, there is ample evidence that in the areas where the Separation Wall has been completed, the number of hostile infiltrations into Israel has decreased to almost zero, thereby reducing the loss of innocent civilian life. For the article's authors to ascribe wholly different motives for this wall without providing an opportunity for another point of view is misleading.
We are fully aware that in every conflict there is innocent suffering, and valid issues on both sides. We are certain that the majority of individuals on both sides yearn for a peaceful solution.
As counsellors we should know well that in every relationship there is more than one point of view. It is regrettable that, before publishing a political article of this nature your editor did not also commission an article which would present the issues from an alternative angle.
Jane Dony, Nadia Abisch, Delia Halpern
