Related articles

The dialogical self

"New thinking in psychotherapy leads us to understand our ‘selves’ as incorporating various I-persons, different voices or multiplicity within the person"

Hello, darkness

"Noting and accepting the pain that enters our lives is far less damaging to our wellbeing than avoiding it – with the
ensuing loss of a meaningful humanity"

Learning zone

Dilemmas

This month's dilemma: Cameron gets on well with his therapist. They have developed a quasi-supervisory relationship during his counselling training and now he thinks she might be an ideal supervisor

 Read more

Student column

We’ve always been told throughout the counselling course that the journey each of us will follow during training will change us

 Read more

Counselling and Psychotherapy Research (CPR)

is a peer reviewed, quarterly international journal. Visit http://www.cprjournal.com/ to read abstracts, receive regular e-bulletins and access the research glossary

Hindsights

Why I became a counsellor

What makes a good therapist? What values do you hold dear? Former nurse Els van Ooijen wanted to be able to help her patients emotionally, but also to understand and heal herself

 Read more

Feedback

We value your feedback. Like most websites, Therapy Today.net is in ongoing development. If we can make the site more user-friendly or relevant to you, please let us know Leave feedback

Volume 18
Issue 10
December 2007

 

Two authors in your October 2007 issue – Steven Hayes (‘Hello darkness’on developments in the field of CBT), and John Rowan (‘The dialogical self’ on personification) – offered their topics as new.

  • Ever heard of Gestalt?

  • by

  • Jim Robinson
  • Two authors in your October 2007 issue – Steven Hayes (‘Hello darkness’on developments in the field of CBT), and John Rowan (‘The dialogical self’ on personification) – offered their topics as new. It seems that neither author knows much about Gestalt therapy, which has been advocating these approaches for years.

    I found it wonderful and exciting that CBT seems to be transforming itself into a humanistic and very Gestalt approach. There is the pleasure of Gestalt being confirmed and corroborated. But more importantly, I felt relief and excitement that such a huge chunk of the world’s total practice might be transformed, over time, into the more creative and three dimensional therapy (heart, head and body) that Gestalt has always been. Maybe ‘the field’ does have some holistic teleological force within it.

    ‘Personification’, that is, taking ownership of and speaking from various ‘I-positions’, has always been part of Gestalt – and not just as a fixed twochair technique. Perls was doing this in the 1950s.

    It seems that the process of Gestalt’s ideas seeping into other approaches – which has been going on since its inception – is continuing. Maybe this is a reflection of Gestaltists’ reluctance to put their theory and practice forward into the wider world that needs to be addressed. But there is still something galling about clothes being stolen without recognition, or even awareness.

    I know about the philosophical and historical roots of Gestalt and how there are no new ideas in the world; Gestalt started as a particularly powerful synthesis and integration of the ideas around at that time. I’m also fairly aware of the plethora of other therapies in the field – whereas the lack of awareness, especially on the part of Steven Hayes, seems astonishing, re-inventing parts of Gestalt and calling it something new.

  • Jim Robinson