Related articles

Counselling: a radical vision for the future

"In order to secure a sustainable future for counselling post-regulation, John McLeod argues that we need to decide on what we want counselling to be, and then work together to achieve our vision"

Learning zone

Dilemmas

This month's dilemma: Would you break confidentiality if a reluctant client fails to attend, or respond to letters while owing money?

 Read more

Student column

The student column will resume again shortly, with a new columnist

 Read more

Counselling and Psychotherapy Research (CPR)

is a peer reviewed, quarterly international journal. Visit http://www.cprjournal.com/ to read abstracts, receive regular e-bulletins and access the research glossary

Hindsights

Why I became a counsellor

What makes a good therapist? What values do you hold dear? Heather Dale responds to our questions

 Read more

Feedback

We value your feedback. Like most websites, Therapy Today.net is in ongoing development. If we can make the site more user-friendly or relevant to you, please let us know Leave feedback

Volume 20
Issue 7
September 2009

 

Professor McLeod said towards the end of his article that he guessed 90 per cent of readers would disagree with him. I am respectfully, but very certainly, one of them!

  • Different approaches

  • by

  • Sue Whitlock
  • Professor McLeod said towards the end of his article that he guessed 90 per cent of readers would disagree with him. I am respectfully, but very certainly, one of them! What has bothered me increasingly in recent years is not where the distinction falls between psychotherapy and counselling, but that that is the only distinction that people seem to make. Everything that isn’t ‘psychotherapy’ comes under the umbrella of ‘counselling’ with no acknowledgment of the huge differences between the various counselling approaches.
     
    When I did my training, not that many years ago, people would ask were you a person-centred or psychodynamic counsellor? There was debate around that time as to whether approaches like CBT, SFBT and other more cognitive or behavioural orientations should really be described as ‘counselling’ at all because they were very different in their focus and length. Now it often feels as though counsellors who work in the ‘old-fashioned’ way should no longer be described as counsellors.
     
    I am a counsellor, not a psychotherapist. My qualification is in counselling. But skills, strengths, strategies, achievement of tasks (tasks?), developing a structured programme – these concepts are totally removed from the way I work.
     
    I work with transference and counter-transference; I work only in private practice; I work almost entirely long term (and at the moment entirely online). I never set contracts for a specific number of sessions – the client and I work together until we both feel that she or he has got as far as they can for the moment; I work deeply, with much emphasis on the unconscious.
     
    McLeod believes that many counsellors are really functioning as ‘brand name’ psychotherapists, and ‘are not interested in developing a more collaborative, contextualised, pluralistic and socially-oriented way of working.’ He seems to be suggesting that we should forget half of what we have learned, abandon half of our skills and merge with the majority, doing work that we are ill-fitted to do.
     

     

  • Sue Whitlock, MBACP (Snr Accred)